Lords of Dogtown

It's been almost a decade since I last watched the documentary Dogtown and Z-Boys and the subsequent feature version, Lords of Dogtown, both of which chronicle the legendary Zephyr skateboarding group that's largely credited for inventing skateboarding as we know it today. I remember liking both, especially the documentary, so when they popped up on Netflix a few weeks ago I figured now was a great time to revisit the flicks.

The documentary holds up well as an entertaining, if somewhat biased look at the group. Not a huge surprise given the fact that the films director was original Z-Boy Stacy Peralta. Either way, I enjoyed it again and was very curious to see how the feature held up.

And dudes, I was a little surprised at just how terrible it is. Filled with awful acting, hokey cameos and a tone that wants to be a lot edgier than it actually is, Lords of Dogtown is a straight up mess.

As with any adaptation of anything, things are going to change from the original property to the new one. It's just part of the deal, and usually, it makes sense. But Peralta, making his feature screenwriting debut, takes the already interesting story of these kids, and throws in every rags to riches cliche in the book. It certainly doesn't help that Peralta makes himself out to be the angel of the entire group. The only one with any kind of decency or loyalty out of the bunch, with everyone else instantly growing giant egos and seeing dollar signs upon the first sign of fame.

Of course, it's entirely possible that that's how it happened. That stuff wasn't in the documentary, but it still could have gone down that way. And besides, even if it didn't, this isn't supposed to be the documentary. This is the dramatization, meant more for entertainment than anything else. And if it had been done well, it wouldn't have bothered me, but it seems as if Peralta just added that stuff in for the sake of being dramatic as opposed to letting any of the drama feel interesting or organic to the story itself.

Ok, so having Peralta write the screenplay was a big mistake, but having director Catherine Hardwicke at the helm was not, for the most part at least. Hardwicke employed a bleached out effect to the camera work that was extremely popular in the mid-aughts for whatever reason, but it works here. Also, she makes sure the footage of these kids skating is just as accurate and fascinating as the real footage from the documentary, even going so far as to mimic some of the shots that Peralta would become famous for in his Bones Brigade skating videos. Hardwicke even assembled a who's who of young performers to star in the flick, including Heath Ledger, Emile Hirsch, Nikki Reed and Johnny Knoxville, among others. Unfortunately, this is where Hardwicke trips up a bit.


Look, I love Emile Hirsch. I think he can be a great actor. His work in Into the Wild is incredible, I'm a huge supporter of Speed Racer and his most recent work in Prince Avalanche is a hoot. But Hirsch is terrible here. He plays Jay Adams, the youngest and wildest of the bunch. The documentary does a great job conveying Adams' spirit and rambunctiousness, but in the movie Hirsch just keeps making weird faces, leaning his head back and widening his eyes. In other words, he tries really hard to be tough and crazy but just comes off as goofy.

And guys, Heath Ledger is bad in this movie. Really bad. His character, one of the founders of the Zephyr group, is seemingly nothing like he was in real life, at least in comparison to the documentary. Which, again, I wouldn't have cared if it worked in the context of the movie, but it doesn't. Heath simply made a choice and ran with it. He employs some kind of surfer dude accent, says "man" a whole lot and acts spaced out for the majority of the movie.

Now, let it be known that Heath Ledger was great. I know it, everybody knows it. And honestly, I really like it when actors make choices like Heath did here. But sometimes actors need to be reigned in, and this was one of those times. But Hardwicke is pretty absent in this instance. She doesn't seem to be able to give any real kind of direction to these actors. To be fair, a lot of the fault lies in the script. And maybe she thought that letting these kids interpret the lines their own way would help the film feel authentic to the way teenagers really talk. But what was meant to feel authentic comes off as amateurish, and a lot of the fault in that area lies with Hardwicke.


As for the tone of the movie, I get the feeling that it really wants to feel dangerous, something the documentary was successful at conveying as these kids tore though what was believed to be the limits of professional skateboarding. As you might be able to guess though, the feature film does not have a dangerous bone in its body.

Oh, I also mentioned that the film has some hokey cameos, and upon reflection that's not entirely true. A few of the original Z-boys pop up quickly in amusing cameos that only hardcore fans would be able to notice. They're fun and harmless and don't detract anything from the movie. But Tony Hawk shows up in a moment that is so *nudge nudge* *wink wink* that it's cringe inducing. I don't really have anything else to say about it, honestly. I just hated it and I needed you to know.


I haven't even gotten into the subplot about the kid with a brain tumor, and you know what, I don't think I will. Suffice it to say the movie doesn't handle it very well and decides to treat more like a joke than anything else.

Alright, well, I didn't like this movie, obviously. I'm a little surprised to find that a lot of you guys do, though. Have you all watched it recently? I can certainly see how it might have been a draw for some of you back in the day. Hell I even mentioned earlier that I remember liking it ten years ago. It has a great cast and an interesting story, it just turns out that the movie is quite terrible as opposed to good like we all thought. Don't worry guys, this isn't a holy grail film from our youth that we're terrified of ruining, it's just a really bad movie.